Acute Myeloid Leukemia Secondary to Treatment with Oxaliplatin Combined with Capecitabine for Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) is often secondary to some cytotoxic drugs or occurs after radiotherapy and immunosuppression therapy. As commonly used drugs in colorectal cancer chemotherapy, oxaliplatin and capecitabine have obvious cytotoxicity, which may also be an important factor causing t-AML. METHODS: In this study, we report the development of treatment-related acute myeloid leukemia in a pT4NIMO colorectal cancer patient after an approximate 16-month latency period following treatment with 6 cycles of oxali-platin (190 mg on Day 1) plus capecitabine (1.5 g orally twice daily on Days 1 - 14) in combination with recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment. The patient developed severe anemia with thrombocytopenia after treatment. After a peripheral blood smear and bone marrow biopsy, the diagnosis of AML-M2a was confirmed. RESULTS: The patient was diagnosed with t-AML approximately 16 months after treatment. Our case illustrates the possibility of some cytotoxic drugs inducing t-AML after colorectal cancer treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that clinicians conduct long-term epidemiological follow-up and epidemiological investigations on patients treated with oxaliplatin and capecitabine. In addition, clinicians should carefully check the complete blood cell count on routine follow-ups and observe the morphological changes of white blood cells in peripheral blood smears, even for asymptomatic patients who have undergone chemotherapy. In this way, we can observe the possibility of its development into secondary leukemia.

[A Case of Breast Cancer That Developed Pulmonary Tumor Thrombotic Microangiopathy during Adjuvant Chemotherapy].

A 68-year-old woman underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy for left breast cancer(triple negative type), cT2N3cM0, cStage ⅢC, and Bt+Ax(Ⅲ). The pathological diagnosis was ypT1aN2aM0, ypStage ⅢA, ER-, PgR-, HER2 score 1+, Ki- 67 25%. Adjuvant radiotherapy(50 Gy/25 Fr)was then administered, followed by capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy. Dyspnea occurred during administration of capecitabine, and computed tomography(CT)and blood test results suggested drug-induced interstitial pneumonia and disseminated intravascular coagulation(DIC). The patient was admitted, and steroid pulse therapy, anticoagulant therapy, and antibiotics were administered; however, the treatment was ineffective, and she died 3 days after admission. An autopsy provided a final diagnosis of pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy(PTTM). There is no established treatment for PTTM, and the prognosis is poor even with anticoagulant therapy and chemotherapy. The definitive diagnosis of PTTM is based on pathological findings; however, during respiratory failure, invasive tests such as lung biopsy are not recommended. Therefore, if a significantly worsening respiratory disorder develops, as in this case, chemotherapy should be considered for suspected PTTM.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of 5-FU or capecitabine combined with cisplatin and docetaxel (mDCF and mDCX) as a first-line chemotherapy regimen in her 2-negative metastatic gastric cancer patients: A retrospective study.

The prognosis of metastatic gastric cancer (GC) is poor, with a median survival time of less than a year. Capecitabine is a prodrug, metabolized by thymidine phosphorylase to its cytotoxic metabolite (5-FU). Few studies have compared capecitabine and 5-FU in mGC. In this retrospective study, we compared the efficacy and safety of modified DCF (mDCF) (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU) and modified DCX (mDCX) (docetaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine) regimens for first-line treatment in patients with mGC. The study included 112 mGC patients treated with either mDCF (n = 69) or mDCX (n = 43) between 2010 and 2021. Demographic data, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were evaluated. The complete response rate in the mDCF group was 10.1%, whereas the complete response rate in the mDCX group was 2.3%. The partial response rate for mDCF and mDCX were 29% and 37%, respectively. The 2 treatment arms of the study had the same objective rate of response and disease control rate (DCR). PFS and OS rates were comparable between the 2 groups. The median PFS in the mDCF and mDCX arms were 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.87-7.14) and 5.0 months (95% CI, 4.10-5.90) respectively (P = .08). The median OS in the mDCF and mDCX arms were 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.53-10.47) and 9.0 months (95% CI, 6.87-11.11) respectively (P = .07). Neutropenia, asthenia, stomatitis, and nausea/vomiting were the most frequently reported grade 3 to 4 adverse events (AEs). The rates of grade 3/4 AEs and dose reduction were comparable between the 2 groups. There was no treatment discontinuation due to grade 3 to 4 AE. As a first-line treatment for patients with mGC, mDCX and mDCF regimens have comparable efficacy and tolerability profiles.

Adjuvant nivolumab, capecitabine or the combination in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer: the OXEL randomized phase II study.

Chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors have a role in the post-neoadjuvant setting in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the effects of nivolumab, a checkpoint inhibitor, capecitabine, or the combination in changing peripheral immunoscore (PIS) remains unclear. This open-label randomized phase II OXEL study (NCT03487666) aimed to assess the immunologic effects of nivolumab, capecitabine, or the combination in terms of the change in PIS (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints included the presence of ctDNA, toxicity, clinical outcomes at 2-years and association of ctDNA and PIS with clinical outcomes. Forty-five women with TNBC and residual invasive disease after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy were randomized to nivolumab, capecitabine, or the combination. Here we show that a combination of nivolumab plus capecitabine leads to a greater increase in PIS from baseline to week 6 (91%) compared with nivolumab (47%) or capecitabine (53%) alone (log-rank p = 0.08), meeting the pre-specified primary endpoint. In addition, the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is associated with disease recurrence, with no new safety signals in the combination arm. Our results provide efficacy and safety data on this combination in TNBC and support further development of PIS and ctDNA analyses to identify patients at high risk of recurrence.

MIR27A rs895819 TC genotype increases risk of fluoropyrimidine-induced severe toxicity independently of DPYD variations.

Aim: MicroRNA 27a (miR-27a) regulates post-transcriptionally DPD activity. We have analyzed the association of MIR27A rs895819T>C variation, that modulates miR-27a expression, with fluropyrimidine-induced toxicity. Materials & methods: MIR27A rs895819T>C genotyping was conducted by TaqMan® allelic discrimination assay in 313 FP-treated cancer patients. Results: In overdominance (TC vs TT + CC), TC genotype was associated with grade 3-4 toxicity (p = 0.002), any grade toxicity (p = 0.052), and delayed drug administration or therapy discontinuation (p = 0.038). Odds of grade 3-4 toxicity were increased by both DPYD deficiency (OR: 8.923; p = 0.006) and MIR27A rs895819 TC genotype (OR: 3.865; p = 0.002). Conclusion: MIR27A rs895819 TC genotype is an independent risk factor for fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity in the Greek population. Thus, MIR27A rs895819TC patients can be closely monitored for fluoropyrimidine-induced severe toxicity.

What is this summary about? To date, for cancer patients treated with fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil), analyzing DPYD gene can be used to guide the optimal dose of treatment in order to reduce the incidence of severe, even life threatening toxicity and thus, increase drug safety. However, the frequency of clinically significant DPYD variants is rare, below 5%, and there is therefore an urgent medical need to identify additional genes that can help in predicting response to fluoropyrimidines. Apart from changes in DPYD gene, noncoding RNAs modulate DPD enzymatic activity. MiR-27a is such a modulator. MIR27A rs895819 polymorphism affects miR-27a expression and is a potential candidate of fluoropyrimidine response. In this study, we have analyzed the association of MIR27A rs895819T>C polymorphism with fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity in cancer patients. What were the results? MIR27A rs895819 TC genotype is associated with fluoropyrimidine-induced grade 3­4 toxicity, any grade toxicity and delayed drug administration or therapy discontinuation. Carrying MIR27A rs895819 TC genotype leads to over of threefold increased risk for grade 3­4 toxicity and can improve sensitivity of DPYD genotyping alone. What do the results mean? MIR27A rs895819 TC carriers should be closely monitored for fluoropyrimidine-induced severe toxicity. Fluoropyrimidine pharmacogenomics can help in improving drug safety and patient response.

Brain Radiotherapy With Pyrotinib and Capecitabine in Patients With ERBB2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: A Nonrandomized Phase 2 Trial.

Importance: The potential benefit of combining intracranial effective systemic therapy with radiotherapy for patients with breast cancer with brain metastases remains unclear. Objective: To assess the activity and safety of combining radiotherapy with pyrotinib and capecitabine in patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a single-arm, single-center, phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial with a safety run-in phase. Between January 2020 and August 2022, patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases were enrolled. The data cutoff date was February 1, 2023. Interventions: Patients received either fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy or whole-brain radiotherapy. Treatment with pyrotinib (400 mg, once daily) and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, twice daily, on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle) was initiated from the first day of radiotherapy to the seventh day after the completion of radiotherapy and continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was 1-year central nervous system (CNS) progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary end points included CNS objective response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), safety, and changes in neurocognitive function. Results: A total of 40 female patients (median age, 50.5 years [IQR, 46-59 years]) were enrolled and received treatment, including 3 patients in safety run-in phase. With a median follow-up of 17.3 months (IQR, 10.3-26.9), the 1-year CNS PFS rate was 74.9% (95% CI, 61.9%-90.7%), and the median CNS PFS was 18.0 months (95% CI, 15.5 to not reached). The 1-year PFS rate was 66.9% (95% CI, 53.1%-84.2%), and the median PFS was 17.6 months (95% CI, 12.8-34.1). The CNS objective response rate was 85% (34 of 40). Median overall survival was not reached. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse event was diarrhea (7.5%). Asymptomatic radiation necrosis was identified in 4 of 67 lesions (6.0%) treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Most patients maintained neurocognitive function, as evaluated by the Mini-Mental State Examination at different points. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this trial suggest that radiotherapy combined with pyrotinib and capecitabine is associated with long intracranial survival benefit in patients with ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer and brain metastases with an acceptable safety profile. This combination deserves further validation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04582968.

Bladder-Preserving Trimodality Therapy With Capecitabine.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer are poor candidates for radical cystectomy or trimodality therapy with maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin or mitomycin C. Given the benefit of chemotherapy in bladder-preserving therapy, less-intense concurrent chemotherapy regimens are needed. This study reports on efficacy and toxicity for patients treated with trimodality therapy using single-agent concurrent capecitabine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients deemed ineligible for radical cystectomy or standard chemoradiotherapy by a multidisciplinary tumor board and patients who refused cystectomy were included. Following TURBT, patients received twice-daily capecitabine (goal dose 825 mg/m2) concurrent with radiotherapy to the bladder +/- pelvis depending on nodal staging and patient risk factors. Toxicity was evaluated prospectively in weekly on-treatment visits and follow-up visits by the treating physicians. Descriptive statistics are provided. Overall, progression-free, cancer-specific, distant metastasis-free, and bladder recurrence-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients met criteria for inclusion from 2013 to 2023. The median age was 79 with 9 patients staged cT3-4a and 7 staged cN1-3. The rate of complete response in the bladder and pelvis was 93%. Overall, progression-free, cancer-specific, distant metastasis-free, and bladder recurrence-free survival at 2 years were estimated as 81%, 65%, 91%, 75%, and 92%, respectively. There were 2 bladder recurrences, both noninvasive. There were 7 grade 3 acute hematologic or metabolic events but no other grade 3+ toxicities. CONCLUSION: Maximal TURBT followed by radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine offers a high rate of bladder control and low rates of acute and late toxicity.

Atherosclerosis Vindicated: A Case of Chest Pain Due to Capecitabine-Induced Coronary Artery Spasm.

BACKGROUND Capecitabine and other 5-fluorouracil prodrugs are medications widely employed in treating solid tumors, including breast and colorectal cancer. However, they carry a notable risk for cardiotoxicity, including coronary vasospasm, possibly related to their impact on vascular endothelium and smooth muscle. CASE REPORT We present a case of a 45-year-old male with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor who developed exertional chest pain after starting capecitabine. Initial evaluations in the emergency department, including a 12-lead electrocardiogram and cardiac enzymes, were normal, but suspicion for coronary vasospasm persisted due to the temporal relationship with drug initiation and symptom characteristics. A graded exercise test reproduced his symptoms, accompanied by hyperacute peaked T waves and subsequent ST segment elevations in the inferior leads. Coronary angiography revealed patent coronary arteries, rendering provocative testing unnecessary due to a high clinical suspicion of capecitabine-induced vasospasm. Discontinuing the patient's medication was a more efficient approach than continuing additional cardiac workup while the drug was still administered. After multidisciplinary discussion, capecitabine was discontinued, leading to symptom resolution and a negative repeat graded exercise test. CONCLUSIONS This case underscores the potential for capecitabine to induce coronary artery vasospasm, emphasizing the importance of prompt medication cessation. Patients receiving capecitabine therapy and experiencing chest pain should undergo an evaluation with consideration of capecitabine-induced vasospasm in the differential diagnosis. Prompt recognition and medication cessation are critical to prevent serious cardiovascular complications including death. In our patient, discontinuing capecitabine resolved his symptoms, emphasizing the significance of discontinuing the causative drug and seeking alternative chemotherapy regimens.

Alternative schedule of temozolomide/capecitabine in neuroendocrine neoplasms.

The chemotherapy regimen capecitabine/temozolomide (CAPTEM) is routinely used in neuroendocrine tumors (NET), with antitumor activity particularly demonstrated in pancreatic or high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). However, different dosing regimens are used, and the optimal schedule remains to be defined. This single-center retrospective analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of CAPTEM in patients with NEN using a schedule starting both compounds simultaneously (temozolomide on days 1-5 and capecitabine on days 1-14 of a 28-day cycle) rather than sequentially. The primary parameters of interest were response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicities following this treatment regimen, hereinafter referred to as TEMCAP. The study population comprised 40 patients, half of whom (n = 20) had pancreatic NEN, and 9 patients (22.5%) had pulmonary or thymic NETs. The most common histology was NET G3 (n = 15, 37.5%), and 8 patients (20.0%) had a neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Most patients (77.5%) had at least one prior systemic therapy, and 16 patients (40.0%) prior chemotherapy. The median number of TEMCAP cycles was 6 (range 1-16). Median PFS for the highly heterogeneous population was 13.3 months, while the median overall survival was 31.9 months. In total, 14/36 patients (38.9%) exhibited a partial response, and the disease control rate was 75.0%. The safety profile of TEMCAP (at a below-target mean temozolomide dose of 118.85 mg/m2) in our cohort was remarkably good with no toxicities of grade 3 or 4. Taken together, the results of this analysis further support the use of temozolomide/capecitabine in NEN and prompt further assessment of our modified TEMCAP schedule.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene variants for predicting grade 4-5 fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity: FUSAFE individual patient data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is the main known cause of life-threatening fluoropyrimidine (FP)-induced toxicities. We conducted a meta-analysis on individual patient data to assess the contribution of deleterious DPYD variants *2A/D949V/*13/HapB3 (recommended by EMA) and clinical factors, for predicting G4-5 toxicity. METHODS: Study eligibility criteria included recruitment of Caucasian patients without DPD-based FP-dose adjustment. Main endpoint was 12-week haematological or digestive G4-5 toxicity. The value of DPYD variants *2A/p.D949V/*13 merged, HapB3, and MIR27A rs895819 was evaluated using multivariable logistic models (AUC). RESULTS: Among 25 eligible studies, complete clinical variables and primary endpoint were available in 15 studies (8733 patients). Twelve-week G4-5 toxicity prevalence was 7.3% (641 events). The clinical model included age, sex, body mass index, schedule of FP-administration, concomitant anticancer drugs. Adding *2A/p.D949V/*13 variants (at least one allele, prevalence 2.2%, OR 9.5 [95%CI 6.7-13.5]) significantly improved the model (p < 0.0001). The addition of HapB3 (prevalence 4.0%, 98.6% heterozygous), in spite of significant association with toxicity (OR 1.8 [95%CI 1.2-2.7]), did not improve the model. MIR27A rs895819 was not associated with toxicity, irrespective of DPYD variants. CONCLUSIONS: FUSAFE meta-analysis highlights the major relevance of DPYD *2A/p.D949V/*13 combined with clinical variables to identify patients at risk of very severe FP-related toxicity.

Low skeletal muscle radiodensity is a risk factor for adjuvant chemotherapy discontinuation in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previously, we reported SMR (skeletal muscle radiodensity) as a potential prognostic marker for colorectal cancer. However, there have been limited studies on the association between SMR and the continuation of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 143 colorectal cancer patients underwent curative surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy using the CAPOX regimen. Patients' SMRs were measured from preoperative CT images and divided into low (bottom quarter) and high (top three quarters) SMR groups. We compared chemotherapy cycles, capecitabine and oxaliplatin doses, and adverse effects in each group. RESULTS: The low SMR group had significantly fewer patients completing adjuvant chemotherapy compared to the high SMR group (44% vs. 68%, P < 0.01). Capecitabine and oxaliplatin doses were also lower in the low SMR group. Incidences of Grade 2 or Grade 3 adverse effects did not differ between groups, but treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects was significantly higher in the low SMR group. Logistic regression analysis revealed Stage III disease (odds ratio 18.09, 95% CI 1.41-231.55) and low SMR (odds ratio 3.26, 95% CI 1.11-9.56) as factors associated with unsuccessful treatment completion. Additionally, a higher proportion of low SMR patients received fewer than 2 cycles of chemotherapy (50% vs. 12%). CONCLUSION: The low SMR group showed higher treatment incompletion rates and received lower drug doses during adjuvant chemotherapy. Low SMR independently contributed to treatment non-completion in colorectal cancer patients.

The FJQR Has Synergistic Effect with Fluoropyrimidine in the Maintenance Treatment for HER-2 Negative Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Maintenance therapy aimed to strengthen the first-line chemotherapy and improve quality of life is needed for gastric cancer (GC). Currently, many clinical studies have confirmed the important role of fluoropyrimidine in the maintenance stage. Our team has created patented prescriptions "Fuzheng jiedu Quyu Method" recipe (FJQR), which was considered as an adjuvant therapeutic scheme (reduce toxicity and increase the efficacy of chemotherapy). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FJQR combined with fluoropyrimidine as a maintenance treatment in HER-2 negative GC patients. METHODS: We performed the analysis of 129 patients with HER-2 negative GC who entered the maintenance stage in our hospital and Tianjin Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and December 2020. Out of the 129 eligible patients, 64 were categorized into the maintenance treatment group with FJQR+fluoropyrimidine, and 65 patients were assigned to the control group if they received fluoropyrimidine alone. Capecitabine was orally 1000mg/m2, Qd, half an hour after meals, and FGQR was 15g Bid after capecitabine. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall remission rate (ORR), quality of Life (QOL), TCM syndrome and safety. RESULTS: The mPFS in the treatment group was significantly prolonged compared with the control group (6.3 vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.03), while the mOS was not substantially improved (11.4 vs. 10.5 months, p = 0.38). Gastrointestinal symptoms and pain became better in the treatment group. The number of distant metastatic organs, first-line chemotherapy cycles, and lymph node metastasis were independent risk predictors for PFS. Blood stasis syndrome may be the protective factor. In terms of safety, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in the treatment group were relatively lighter, and the incidence of grade III-IV AEs could be significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: FJQR and fluoropyrimidine have synergistic effects as maintenance treatment in HER-2 negative GC, with good efficacy and safety.

Efficacy of GV1001 with gemcitabine/capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma having high serum eotaxin levels (KG4/2015): an open-label, randomised, Phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The TeloVac study indicated GV1001 did not improve the survival of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the cytokine examinations suggested that high serum eotaxin levels may predict responses to GV1001. This Phase III trial assessed the efficacy of GV1001 with gemcitabine/capecitabine for eotaxin-high patients with untreated advanced PDAC. METHODS: Patients recruited from 16 hospitals received gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, D 1, 8, and 15)/capecitabine (830 mg/m2 BID for 21 days) per month either with (GV1001 group) or without (control group) GV1001 (0.56 mg; D 1, 3, and 5, once on week 2-4, 6, then monthly thereafter) at random in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary end points included time to progression (TTP), objective response rate, and safety. RESULTS: Total 148 patients were randomly assigned to the GV1001 (n = 75) and control groups (n = 73). The GV1001 group showed improved median OS (11.3 vs. 7.5 months, P = 0.021) and TTP (7.3 vs. 4.5 months, P = 0.021) compared to the control group. Grade >3 adverse events were reported in 77.3% and 73.1% in the GV1001 and control groups (P = 0.562), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: GV1001 plus gemcitabine/capecitabine improved OS and TTP compared to gemcitabine/capecitabine alone in eotaxin-high patients with advanced PDAC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02854072.

Spotlight on capecitabine for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic carcinoma of various origin: A retrospective study of 25 dogs.

Capecitabine, the oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, is indicated in people to treat various malignant epithelial cancers. In dogs, capecitabine has not been extensively evaluated. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate toxicity and preliminary efficacy of single agent capecitabine in dogs with advanced malignant epithelial cancers of any site, for which no effective therapy existed, conventional treatment failed or was declined. Capecitabine was administered orally at 750 mg/m2 from day 1 to 14, followed by 1-week rest period, given as 3-week cycles. Safety evaluation was performed after 2 cycles, and every 2-3 cycles thereafter. Tumour response was determined every 2-3 cycles. Twenty-five dogs with hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 6), lung papillary carcinoma (n = 4), anal sac adenocarcinoma (n = 3), colic adenocarcinoma (n = 2), and other individually represented epithelial cancers (n = 10) were included. Dogs received a median of 4 cycles (range, 2-43) for a median of 84 days (range, 42-913). Toxicity occurred in 17 (68.0%) dogs; the most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal, with the majority being self-resolving and of mild grade. Of the 22 dogs with macroscopic disease, 3 (13.6%) achieved partial remission, 16 (72.7%) were stable and 3 (13.6%) progressed; overall clinical benefit rate was 86.4%. Median progression-free interval was 93 days (95% CI 42-154; range, 1-521) and median tumour-specific survival was 273 days (95% CI 116-482; range 45-913). These findings suggest that capecitabine is an attractive option for the treatment of several types of carcinomas in dogs. Prospective studies are warranted to optimize the scheduling of capecitabine and confirm its efficacy.

A Nomogram to Predict Severe Toxicity in DPYD Wild-Type Patients Treated With Capecitabine-Based Anticancer Regimens.

DPYD-guided dosing has improved the safety of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in recent years. However, severe toxicity remains in ~ 23% of patients not carrying DPYD variant alleles treated with capecitabine. Therefore, we developed a predictive model based on patient-related and treatment-related factors aimed at estimating the risk of developing severe capecitabine-related toxicity. The nomogram was developed using data from two large clinical trials (NCT00838370 and NCT02324452). Patients with cancer carrying a DPYD variant allele (DPYD*2A, c.1236G>A, c.2846A>T, and c.1679T>G) were excluded. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression using predetermined predictors based on previous findings, including age, sex, body surface area, type of treatment regimen, and creatinine levels were used to develop the nomogram. The developed model was internally validated using bootstrap resampling and cross-validation. This model was not externally or clinically validated. A total of 2,147 DPYD wild-type patients with cancer treated with capecitabine-based chemotherapy regimens were included of which complete data of 1,745 patients were available and used for the development of the nomogram. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression showed that age, sex, and type of treatment regimen were strong predictors of severe capecitabine-related toxicity in DPYD wild-type patients. Internal validation demonstrated a concordance index of 0.68 which indicates a good discriminative ability for prediction of severe capecitabine-related toxicity. The developed nomogram includes readily available parameters and may be a helpful tool for clinicians to assess the risk of developing severe capecitabine-related toxicity in patients without known risk DPYD variant alleles treated with capecitabine-based anticancer regimens.

Intake and biomarkers of folate and folic acid as determinants of chemotherapy-induced toxicities in patients with colorectal cancer: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine is an oral chemotherapeutic drug showing antitumor activity through inhibition of thymidylate synthase, an enzyme involved in folate metabolism. There are concerns about the high intake of certain vitamins, and specifically folate, during chemotherapy with capecitabine. Whether folate or folic acid, the synthetic variant of the vitamin, impact treatment toxicity remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We studied associations between intake and biomarkers of folate as well as folic acid and toxicities in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving capecitabine. METHODS: Within the prospective COLON (Colorectal cancer: Longitudinal, Observational study on Nutritional and lifestyle factors that influence recurrence, survival, and quality of life) cohort, 290 patients with stage II to III CRC receiving capecitabine were identified. Dietary and supplemental intake of folate and folic acid were assessed at diagnosis and during chemotherapy using questionnaires (available for 280 patients). Plasma folate and folic acid levels were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and were available for 212 patients. Toxicities were defined as toxicity-related modifications of treatment, including dose reductions, regimen switches, and early discontinuation. Associations of intake and biomarkers of folate and folic acid with toxicities were determined using Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: In total, 153 (53%) patients experienced toxicities leading to modification of capecitabine treatment. Folate intake and plasma folate levels were not associated with risk of toxicities. However, use of folic acid-containing supplements during treatment (hazard ratio (HR) 1.81 and 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-2.85) and presence of folic acid in plasma at diagnosis (HR 2.09, 95% CI: 1.24, 3.52) and during treatment (HR 2.31, 95% CI: 1.29, 4.13) were associated with an increased risk of toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a potential association between folic acid and capecitabine-induced toxicities, providing a rationale to study diet-drug interactions and raise further awareness of the use of dietary supplements during oncological treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL DETAILS: This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03191110.